Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 19 de 19
Filtrar
1.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 12(1): 122-138, 2024 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38050339

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Management of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection requires co-treatment with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) and the use of antibiotics to achieve successful eradication. AIM: To evaluate the role of dosage of PPIs and the duration of therapy in the effectiveness of H. pylori eradication treatments based on the 'European Registry on Helicobacter pylori management' (Hp-EuReg). METHODS: Hp-EuReg is a multicentre, prospective, non-interventionist, international registry on the routine clinical practice of H. pylori management by European gastroenterologists. All infected adult patients were systematically registered from 2013 to 2022. RESULTS: Overall, 36,579 patients from five countries with more than 1000 patients were analysed. Optimal (≥90%) first-line-modified intention-to-treat effectiveness was achieved with the following treatments: (1) 14-day therapies with clarithromycin-amoxicillin-bismuth and metronidazole-tetracycline-bismuth, both independently of the PPI dose prescribed; (2) All 10-day (except 10-day standard triple therapy) and 14-day therapies with high-dose PPIs; and (3) 10-day quadruple therapies with clarithromycin-amoxicillin-bismuth, metronidazole-tetracycline-bismuth, and clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazole (sequential), all with standard-dose PPIs. In first-line treatment, optimal effectiveness was obtained with high-dose PPIs in all 14-day treatments, in 10- and 14-day bismuth quadruple therapies and in 10-day sequential with standard-dose PPIs. Optimal second-line effectiveness was achieved with (1) metronidazole-tetracycline-bismuth quadruple therapy for 14- and 10 days with standard and high-dose PPIs, respectively; and (2) levofloxacin-amoxicillin triple therapy for 14 days with high-dose PPIs. None of the 7-day therapies in both treatment lines achieved optimal effectiveness. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend, in first-line treatment, the use of high-dose PPIs in 14-day triple therapy and in 10-or 14-day quadruple concomitant therapy in first-line treatment, while standard-dose PPIs would be sufficient in 10-day bismuth quadruple therapies. On the other hand, in second-line treatment, high-dose PPIs would be more beneficial in 14-day triple therapy with levofloxacin and amoxicillin or in 10-day bismuth quadruple therapy either as a three-in-one single capsule or in the traditional scheme.


Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Adulto , Humanos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Metronidazol , Claritromicina/uso terapêutico , Levofloxacino/uso terapêutico , Bismuto , Estudos Prospectivos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Amoxicilina/uso terapêutico , Tetraciclina , Sistema de Registros
2.
Endosc Int Open ; 11(8): E785-E793, 2023 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37593156

RESUMO

Background and study aims Effective bowel cleansing is critical for detecting lesions during colonoscopy, highlighting the importance of bowel preparations. 1L polyethylene glycol (PEG) + ascorbate (Asc) is the only recommended 1L PEG product in Europe and the United States. Its efficacy was demonstrated in large-scale controlled trials and confirmed in smaller-scale real-world studies. However, no large-scale real-world data exist. Patients and methods This observational, retrospective, multicenter study, used outpatient follow-up data from medical records from 10 centers in Spain and two in Portugal. Outpatients aged ≥18 years using 1L PEG + Asc as bowel preparation were included. The main outcome measures were overall adequate colon cleansing (Boston Bowel Preparation Scale [BBPS] score ≥6 with BBPS score ≥2 in each segment) and high-quality cleansing of the right colon (BBPS score=3). Results Data from 13169 eligible patients were included. Overall cleansing success was achieved in 89.3% (95%CI 88.7%-89.8%) and high-quality cleansing in the right colon in 49.3% (95%CI 48.4%-50.2%) of patients. For the overnight split-dose and same-day regimens, overall adequate quality cleansing success rate was 94.7% and 86.7% ( P <0.0001) and high-quality cleansing of the right colon rate was 65.4% and 41.4% ( P <0.0001), respectively. Colonoscopy was completed in 97.3% of patients, with non-completion due to poor preparation in only 0.8%; 2.3% of patients experienced at least one adverse event (AE). Conclusions This large-scale, real-world study demonstrates the effectiveness of 1L PEG + Asc in the total and right colon, with a low percentage of patients with AEs in routine clinical practice.

3.
J Clin Med ; 11(12)2022 06 20.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35743627

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Randomized clinical trials and meta-analyses, primarily from Asian countries, have reported good effectiveness with high-dose dual therapy (HDDT) including a proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and amoxicillin when prescribed as H. pylori first-line or rescue treatment. However, combining amoxicillin with PPIs in the 1990s in several European countries yielded suboptimal results. METHODS: An international, multicenter, prospective non-interventional Registry (Hp-EuReg) aimed to evaluate the decisions and outcomes of H. pylori management by European gastroenterologists. All infected adult cases treated with HDDT were registered at e-CRF AEG-REDCap platform until June 2021. Sixty patients were prescribed with HDDT (98% compliance), 19 of them received a first-line therapy and 41 a rescue treatment (second- to sixth-line). RESULTS: Overall HDDT effectiveness was 52% (per-protocol) and 51% (modified intention-to-treat). First-line and rescue treatment lines were equally effective, but the effectiveness was worse when patients had previously received metronidazole, tetracycline, or rifabutin. Adding bismuth to HDDT in rescue treatment did not yield better results. The incidence of adverse events was 30%, diarrhea being the most common (20% of patients); no serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Although HDDT is safe and has good compliance, it is not a good option in European first-line or rescue H. pylori treatment, even when adding bismuth.

4.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 114(2): 89-95, febrero 2022. graf, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-205549

RESUMO

Introducción: el objetivo principal de este estudio fue evaluar la reducción de los síntomas gastrointestinales de pacientes con terapia de erradicación cuádruple con bismuto, complementada con cepas de Lactobacillus reuteri (DSM 17938 y ATCC PTA 6475), frente a un placebo.Materiales y métodos: ensayo clínico aleatorizado, doble ciego, de brazos paralelos y controlado con placebo. Los pacientes recibieron en primera línea el régimen erradicador basado en subcitrato de bismuto potásico, metronidazol, clorhidrato de tetraciclina (cápsulas tres en uno) y omeprazol 40 mg dos veces al día durante diez días, más un comprimido (probiótico o placebo) durante treinta días. En el seguimiento se evaluaron los síntomas gastrointestinales mediante una escala de valoración (GSRS) y los eventos adversos a los 0, 14, 28 y 56 días.Resultados: se incluyeron un total de 80 pacientes desde febrero de 2018 a mayo de 2019 en un solo centro. El tratamiento erradicador fue eficaz en el 85 % de los pacientes, sin diferencias entre los dos brazos de tratamiento. En el grupo que recibió el probiótico, el dolor abdominal se redujo en el 42 % de los pacientes, en comparación con el 19 % del grupo de control (OR: 0,27; IC 95 %: 0,13-0,58; p < 0,001), y la distensión abdominal se redujo un 25 %, frente a un 17 % en el grupo de control (OR: 0,24; IC 95 %: 0,19-0,84; p < 0,001).Conclusiones: el tratamiento con L. reuteri consiguió reducir solo el dolor y la distensión abdominal. Se necesitan más estudios para determinar la contribución de los probióticos como terapia adyuvante en la erradicación de H. pylori. (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Dor Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Dor Abdominal/terapia , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Limosilactobacillus reuteri , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Tratamento Farmacológico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Metronidazol/efeitos adversos
5.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 114(2): 89-95, 2022 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33947195

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: the primary goal of this study was to compare gastrointestinal symptom reduction in patients on bismuth-containing quadruple eradication therapy supplemented with Lactobacillus reuteri strains (DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 6475) or placebo. MATERIALS AND METHODS: this was a randomized, double-blind, parallel-arm, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Patients received a first-line eradication regimen based on bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole, tetracycline hydrochloride (three-in-one capsules) and omeprazole 40 mg twice a day for ten days, plus a probiotic or placebo tablet for 30 days. During follow-up, gastrointestinal symptoms were assessed using an evaluation scale (GSRS), and adverse events were collected at 0, 14, 28 and 56 days. RESULTS: a total of 80 patients were included from February 2018 to May 2019 at a single site. Eradication therapy was effective in 85 % of patients, with no differences between treatment arms. In the group receiving the probiotic, abdominal pain decreased in 42 % of patients, compared with 19 % in the control group (OR: 0.27; CI, 0.13-0.58; p < 0.001), and abdominal distension decreased in 25 % versus 17 % in the control group (OR: 0.24; IC, 0.19-0.84; p < 0.001); Conclusions: treatment with L. reuteri only reduced abdominal pain and distension. Further studies are needed to establish the role of probiotics as adjuvant therapy in H. pylori eradication.


Assuntos
Infecções por Helicobacter , Helicobacter pylori , Limosilactobacillus reuteri , Probióticos , Dor Abdominal/tratamento farmacológico , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Humanos , Metronidazol/efeitos adversos , Probióticos/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento
6.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 116(6): 1220-1229, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33840725

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The safety of Helicobacter pylori eradication treatments and to what extent adverse events (AEs) influence therapeutic compliance in clinical practice are hardly known. Our aim was to assess the frequency, type, intensity, and duration of AEs, and their impact on compliance, for the most frequently used treatments in the "European Registry on Helicobacter pylori management." METHODS: Systematic prospective noninterventional registry of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists (27 countries, 300 investigators) on the management of H. pylori infection in routine clinical practice. All prescribed eradication treatments and their corresponding safety profile were recorded. AEs were classified depending on the intensity of symptoms as mild/moderate/severe and as serious AEs. All data were subject to quality control. RESULTS: The different treatments prescribed to 22,492 patients caused at least 1 AE in 23% of the cases; the classic bismuth-based quadruple therapy was the worst tolerated (37% of AEs). Taste disturbance (7%), diarrhea (7%), nausea (6%), and abdominal pain (3%) were the most frequent AEs. The majority of AEs were mild (57%), 6% were severe, and only 0.08% were serious, with an average duration of 7 days. The treatment compliance rate was 97%. Only 1.3% of the patients discontinued treatment due to AEs. Longer treatment durations were significantly associated with a higher incidence of AEs in standard triple, concomitant, bismuth quadruple, and levofloxacin triple or quadruple therapies. DISCUSSION: Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment frequently induces AEs, although they are usually mild and of limited duration. Their appearance does not interfere significantly with treatment compliance.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Bismuto/efeitos adversos , Efeitos Colaterais e Reações Adversas Relacionados a Medicamentos/epidemiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/efeitos adversos , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Quimioterapia Combinada , Europa (Continente)/epidemiologia , Feminino , Infecções por Helicobacter/epidemiologia , Helicobacter pylori , Humanos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Sistema de Registros
7.
Antibiotics (Basel) ; 10(1)2020 Dec 25.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33375717

RESUMO

The management of Helicobacter pylori infection has to rely on previous local effectiveness due to the geographical variability of antibiotic resistance. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness of first and second-line H. pylori treatment in Spain, where the empirical prescription is recommended. A multicentre prospective non-interventional registry of the clinical practice of European gastroenterologists concerning H. pylori infection (Hp-EuReg) was developed, including patients from 2013 until June 2019. Effectiveness was evaluated descriptively and through a multivariate analysis concerning age, gender, presence of ulcer, proton-pump inhibitor (PPI) dose, therapy duration and compliance. Overall, 53 Spanish hospitals were included, and 10,267 patients received a first-line therapy. The best results were obtained with the 10-day bismuth single-capsule therapy (95% cure rate by intention-to-treat) and with both the 14-day bismuth-clarithromycin quadruple (PPI-bismuth-clarithromycin-amoxicillin, 91%) and the 14-day non-bismuth quadruple concomitant (PPI-clarithromycin-amoxicillin-metronidazole, 92%) therapies. Second-line therapies were prescribed to 2448 patients, with most-effective therapies being the triple quinolone (PPI-amoxicillin-levofloxacin/moxifloxacin) and the bismuth-levofloxacin quadruple schemes (PPI-bismuth-levofloxacin-amoxicillin) prescribed for 14 days (92%, 89% and 90% effectiveness, respectively), and the bismuth single-capsule (10 days, 88.5%). Compliance, longer duration and higher acid inhibition were associated with higher effectiveness. "Optimized" H. pylori therapies achieve over 90% success in Spain.

8.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 112(11): 821-825, nov. 2020. ilus, tab
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-198764

RESUMO

INTRODUCCIÓN: la endoscopia tiene un papel fundamental en el manejo de los pacientes con colitis ulcerosa (CU), ya que permite la visualización y evaluación de la gravedad de la enfermedad. No obstante, dicha evaluación no es siempre algo objetivo, por lo que se han desarrollado diferentes escalas que pretenden homogeneizar los hallazgos. Objetico: el objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la variabilidad interobservador entre el Índice de Mayo Endoscópico (IME) y el Índice de Severidad Endoscópica de la Colitis Ulcerosa (UCEIS), al analizar la gravedad de las lesiones endoscópicas en pacientes con CU. El objetivo secundario fue analizar si la preparación catártica afectaba al grado de concordancia entre los endoscopistas. MATERIAL Y MÉTODOS: se trata de un estudio observacional comparativo de una única cohorte a la cual se realiza una colonoscopia bajo guía de práctica clínica habitual a pacientes con CU y se estadifica según el IME y el UCEIS por tres endoscopistas expertos. Para valorar el grado de correlación interobservador se utilizaron el índice de Kappa para el IME y el coeficiente de correlación intraclase para el UCEIS. Se incluyeron 67 pacientes, con edad media de 51 años (DE ± 16,7) e índice de Mayo clínico medio de 3,07 (DE ± 2,54). RESULTADOS: el índice de Kappa ponderado entre los endoscopistas A y B para el IME fue de 0,8; entre el A y el C, de 0,52; y entre el B y el C, de 0,49. Para el UCEIS, el coeficiente de correlación intraclase fue del 0,922 entre los tres endoscopistas (IC 95 %: 0,832-0,959). Se encontró una mejor correlación interobservador cuando la preparación catártica era ≥ 8 según la escala de Boston. CONCLUSIÓN: existe, por tanto, una superior correlación entre los diferentes endoscopistas para el UCEIS que para el IME, por lo que debería ser considerado como el mejor índice a utilizar en la práctica clínica. Una buena preparación catártica es importante para mejorar la correlación interobservador


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Idoso , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico por imagem , Colite Ulcerativa/patologia , Colonoscopia/métodos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Padrões de Referência , Valores de Referência , Variações Dependentes do Observador
9.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(11): 821-825, 2020 Nov.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33054301

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: endoscopy plays an essential role in the management of patients with ulcerative colitis (UC), as it allows us to visualize and assess the severity of the disease. Different scores have been devised to standardize the findings because such assessments are not always objective. AIMS: the aim of this study was to assess the interobserver variability between the Index of Mayo Endoscopy (IME) and the Ulcerative Colitis Endoscopy Index of Severity (UCEIS), analyzing the severity of the endoscopic lesions in patients with UC. The secondary aim was to analyze if the cathartic preparation affected the degree of concordance amongst the endoscopists. MATERIAL AND METHODS: this was a single-cohort observational, comparative study in which a colonoscopy was performed in patients with UC, as the normal clinical practice. The results were classified according to the IME and the UCEIS by three endoscopic specialists. In order to assess the degree of interobserver correlation, the Kappa index for IME was used and the intraclass correlation coefficient was used for UCEIS. RESULTS: sixty-seven patients were included in the study. The average age was 51 (SD ± 16.7) and the average Mayo Clinic index was 3.07 (SD ± 2.54). The weighted Kappa index between endoscopists A and B for the IME was 0.8, 0.52 between A and C and 0.49 between B and C. The intraclass correlation coefficient for UCEIS was 0.922 between the three endoscopists (95 % CI: 0.832-0.959). A better interobserver correlation was found when the cathartic preparation was ≥ 8 based on the Boston Scale. CONCLUSIONS: there was a higher correlation between the different endoscopists for the UCEIS than for the IME. Thus, this should be considered to be the best index to use in the clinical practice. A good cleansing preparation is important to improve the interobserver correlation.


Assuntos
Colite Ulcerativa , Estudos de Coortes , Colite Ulcerativa/diagnóstico , Colonoscopia , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
10.
GE Port J Gastroenterol ; 27(5): 324-335, 2020 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32999905

RESUMO

The present evidence-based guidelines are focused on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in the management of small-bowel diseases. A panel of experts selected by the Spanish and Portuguese small bowel study groups reviewed the available evidence focusing on the main indications of this technique, its role in the management algorithm of each indication and on its diagnostic and therapeutic yields. A set of recommendations were issued accordingly.


Estas recomendações baseadas na evidência detalham o uso da enteroscopia assistida por dispositivo no manejo clínico das doenças do intestino delgado. Um conjunto de Gastrenterologistas diferenciados em patologia do intestino delgado foi selecionado pelos grupos de estudos Espanhol e Portugués de intestino delgado para rever a evidência disponível sobre as principais indicações desta técnica, o seu papel nos algoritmos de manejo de cada indicação e sobre o seu rendimento diagnóstico e terapêutico. Foi gerado um conjunto de recomendações pelos autores.

11.
Helicobacter ; 25(5): e12722, 2020 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32656898

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Different bismuth quadruple therapies containing proton-pump inhibitors, bismuth salts, metronidazole, and a tetracycline have been recommended as third-line Helicobacter pylori eradication treatment after failure with clarithromycin and levofloxacin. AIM: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of third-line treatments with bismuth, metronidazole, and either tetracycline or doxycycline. METHODS: Sub-study with Spanish data of the "European Registry on H pylori Management" (Hp-EuReg), international multicenter prospective non-interventional Registry of the routine clinical practice of gastroenterologists. After previous failure with clarithromycin- and levofloxacin-containing therapies, patients receiving a third-line regimen with 10/14-day bismuth salts, metronidazole, and either tetracycline (BQT-Tet) or doxycycline (BQT-Dox), or single capsule (BQT-three-in-one) were included. Data were registered at AEG-REDCap database. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed. RESULTS: Four-hundred and fifty-four patients have been treated so far: 85 with BQT-Tet, 94 with BQT-Dox, and 275 with BQT-three-in-one. Average age was 53 years, 68% were women. Overall modified intention-to-treat and per-protocol eradication rates were 81% (BQT-Dox: 65%, BQT-Tet: 76%, BQT-three-in-one: 88%) and 82% (BQT-Dox: 66%, BQT-Tet: 77%, BQT-three-in-one: 88%), respectively. By logistic regression, higher eradication rates were associated with compliance (OR = 2.96; 95% CI = 1.01-8.84) and no prior metronidazole use (OR = 1.96; 95% CI = 1.15-3.33); BQT-three-in-one was superior to BQT-Dox (OR = 4.46; 95% CI = 2.51-8.27), and BQT-Tet was marginally superior to BQT-Dox (OR = 1.67; 95% CI = 0.85-3.29). CONCLUSION: Third-line H pylori eradication with bismuth quadruple treatment (after failure with clarithromycin and levofloxacin) offers acceptable efficacy and safety. Highest efficacy was found in compliant patients and those taking 10-day BQT-three-in-one or 14-day BQT-Tet. Doxycycline seems to be less effective and therefore should not be recommended.


Assuntos
Bismuto/administração & dosagem , Doxiciclina/administração & dosagem , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Metronidazol/administração & dosagem , Tetraciclina/administração & dosagem , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/administração & dosagem , Combinação de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Helicobacter pylori/efeitos dos fármacos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Espanha , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
12.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(4): 332-333, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32250152

RESUMO

Small intestine hemangiomas are benign vascular tumors that usually present with occult gastrointestinal bleeding. Endoscopic capsule and enteroscopy are two tools that help in your preoperative diagnosis.


Assuntos
Anemia , Hemangioma , Anemia/etiologia , Endoscopia Gastrointestinal , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/etiologia , Hemangioma/complicações , Hemangioma/diagnóstico por imagem , Hemangioma/cirurgia , Humanos , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia
13.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 112(4): 309-318, abr. 2020. tab
Artigo em Inglês | IBECS | ID: ibc-187512

RESUMO

The present evidence-based guidelines are focused on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in the management of small-bowel diseases. A panel of experts selected by the Spanish and Portuguese small-bowel study groups reviewed the available evidence focusing on the main indications of this technique, its role in the management algorithm of each indication, and its diagnostic and therapeutic yield. A set of recommendations was issued accordingly


No disponible


Assuntos
Humanos , Enteroscopia de Balão/métodos , Intestino Delgado/cirurgia , Hemorragia Gastrointestinal/cirurgia , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , 16595/etiologia , Doença de Crohn/cirurgia , Polipose Intestinal/cirurgia , Doença Celíaca/cirurgia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Sangue Oculto , Portugal , Espanha
15.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 112(4): 309-318, 2020 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32188259

RESUMO

The present evidence-based guidelines are focused on the use of device-assisted enteroscopy in the management of small-bowel diseases. A panel of experts selected by the Spanish and Portuguese small-bowel study groups reviewed the available evidence focusing on the main indications of this technique, its role in the management algorithm of each indication, and its diagnostic and therapeutic yield. A set of recommendations was issued accordingly.


Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Enteropatias , Humanos , Enteropatias/diagnóstico por imagem , Enteropatias/terapia , Intestino Delgado/diagnóstico por imagem , Portugal
17.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 110(2): 129, 2018 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29278003

RESUMO

We present a case of ileocecal endometriosis as a cause of infrequent ileocolic intussusception in an adult patient. It is reviewed as published by the authors Sanchez Cifuentes, A et al. 2016, emphasizing the rarity of the location of endometriosis, and its association as a cause of intussusception.


Assuntos
Doenças do Ceco/etiologia , Endometriose/complicações , Doenças do Íleo/etiologia , Intussuscepção/etiologia , Doenças do Ceco/patologia , Doenças do Ceco/cirurgia , Úlcera Duodenal/etiologia , Úlcera Duodenal/patologia , Úlcera Duodenal/cirurgia , Endometriose/patologia , Endometriose/cirurgia , Feminino , Humanos , Doenças do Íleo/patologia , Doenças do Íleo/cirurgia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade
18.
Rev. esp. enferm. dig ; 109(8): 552-558, ago. 2017. tab, ilus
Artigo em Espanhol | IBECS | ID: ibc-165156

RESUMO

Objetivo: evaluar la eficacia y seguridad de la terapia cuádruple con omeprazol más 'una cápsula tres-en-uno' que contiene subcitrato de bismuto, metronidazol y tetraciclina (BMTO) en pacientes, naïve y fracasos previos, diagnosticados de infección con Helicobacter pylori, en el área de Sevilla, en condiciones de práctica clínica habitual. Métodos: estudio prospectivo realizado en pacientes consecutivos con infección confirmada por Helicobacter pylori y síntomas gastrointestinales del tracto superior. Los pacientes fueron tratados, tras firmar el consentimiento, con Pylera(R) (cápsula tres-en-uno que contiene 140 mg de subcitrato de bismuto, 125 mg de metronidazol y 125 mg de tetraciclina) cuatro veces al día, más omeprazol (20 o 40 mg) dos veces al día, durante diez días. La erradicación fue establecida mediante un test de urea en aliento negativo realizado, al menos, 28 días después de finalizar el tratamiento. Resultados: un total de 58 pacientes fueron incluidos consecutivamente, dos de ellos fueron retirados del estudio por vómitos al tercer y quinto día, respectivamente. Diecisiete (29,3%) pacientes tenían historia previa de tratamiento de su infección por Helicobacter pylori. En la población por intención de tratar las tasas de erradicación fueron del 97,6% (40/41) y del 82,4% (14/17) en los pacientes tratados con Pylera(R) como primera línea o como terapia de rescate, respectivamente. Veintiocho pacientes (48%) presentaron, al menos, un acontecimiento adverso, la mayoría (86%) leves. Conclusión: diez días de tratamiento con BMTO es una estrategia eficaz y segura en pacientes con infección confirmada por Helicobacter pylori (AU)


Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a quadruple regimen (BMTO) of the '3-in-1 capsule' (containing bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole and tetracycline) plus omeprazole in naïve and previously treated patients diagnosed with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in the clinical setting in Seville (Spain). Methods: This is a prospective study carried out on consecutive patients with a confirmed H. pylori infection and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. After providing their informed consent, the patients were treated for ten days with a 3-in-1 capsule containing bismuth subcitrate potassium (140 mg), metronidazole (125 mg) and tetracycline (125 mg: Pylera(R)), three capsules four times daily, plus omeprazole (20 or 40 mg) twice daily. Eradication of infection was determined by a negative urea breath test at least 28 days after the end of treatment. Results: A total of 58 consecutive patients were enrolled into this study, two of whom withdrew early due to vomiting on days three and five, respectively. In this cohort, 17 patients (29.3%) had a prior history of medication to treat H. pylori. In the intent-to-treat population, eradication was achieved in 97.6% (40/41) and 82.4% (14/17) of cases in patients treated with BMTO as a first-line or rescue therapy, respectively. At least one adverse event was reported by 28 (48%) patients, mostly mild effects (86%). Conclusion: A ten day treatment with BMTO is an effective and safe strategy to combat confirmed H. pylori infection in patients (AU)


Assuntos
Humanos , Masculino , Feminino , Adulto , Helicobacter pylori , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Bismuto/uso terapêutico , Omeprazol/uso terapêutico , Erradicação de Doenças/métodos , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Resultado do Tratamento , Avaliação de Eficácia-Efetividade de Intervenções , Estudos Prospectivos , Helicobacter pylori/isolamento & purificação , Tetraciclina/uso terapêutico , Análise Multivariada
19.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 109(8): 552-558, 2017 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28617030

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of a quadruple regimen (BMTO) of the "3-in-1 capsule" (containing bismuth subcitrate potassium, metronidazole and tetracycline) plus omeprazole in naïve and previously treated patients diagnosed with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection in the clinical setting in Seville (Spain). METHODS: This is a prospective study carried out on consecutive patients with a confirmed H. pylori infection and upper gastrointestinal symptoms. After providing their informed consent, the patients were treated for ten days with a 3-in-1 capsule containing bismuth subcitrate potassium (140 mg), metronidazole (125 mg) and tetracycline (125 mg: Pylera®), three capsules four times daily, plus omeprazole (20 or 40 mg) twice daily. Eradication of infection was determined by a negative urea breath test at least 28 days after the end of treatment. RESULTS: A total of 58 consecutive patients were enrolled into this study, two of whom withdrew early due to vomiting on days three and five, respectively. In this cohort, 17 patients (29.3%) had a prior history of medication to treat H. pylori. In the intent-to-treat population, eradication was achieved in 97.6% (40/41) and 82.4% (14/17) of cases in patients treated with BMTO as a first-line or rescue therapy, respectively. At least one adverse event was reported by 28 (48%) patients, mostly mild effects (86%). CONCLUSION: A ten day treatment with BMTO is an effective and safe strategy to combat confirmed H. pylori infection in patients.


Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Infecções por Helicobacter/tratamento farmacológico , Helicobacter pylori , Metronidazol/uso terapêutico , Omeprazol/uso terapêutico , Compostos Organometálicos/uso terapêutico , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Tetraciclina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Antibacterianos/efeitos adversos , Estudos de Coortes , Combinação de Medicamentos , Quimioterapia Combinada , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Metronidazol/efeitos adversos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Omeprazol/administração & dosagem , Compostos Organometálicos/efeitos adversos , Estudos Prospectivos , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/administração & dosagem , Tetraciclina/efeitos adversos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA
...